Article "نون (قبیلہ)" in Urdu Wikipedia has 2.5 points for quality (as of August 1, 2024). The article contains 0 references and 3 sections. The article also contains quality flaw template, which reduce quality score.
Since the creation of article "نون (قبیلہ)", its content was written by 8 registered users of Urdu Wikipedia (5419th place) and edited by 8 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 8 times in Urdu Wikipedia and cited 8 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from August 1, 2024 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Urdu: #4972 08.2017 |
Global: #4917036 08.2008 |
On 18 September 2024 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: pager, Salvatore Schillaci, Hezbollah, UEFA Champions League, 2024–25 UEFA Champions League, 2024 Lebanon communication device explosions, Lyle and Erik Menéndez, Sean Combs, deaths in 2024, Shōgun.
In Urdu Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: محمد بن عبد اللہ, انا لله و انا الیه راجعون, میلاد النبی, سید احمد خان, محمد اقبال, تاریخ ولادت محمد بن عبد اللہ, ابوبکر صدیق, عمر بن خطاب, پاکستان, ختم نبوت.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from August, 2024. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from July 2024 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2023... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(1.95+0+0+11.11+0)-0.13$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
